Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Educational Researchers 2025, Vol. 16(3) 1-15
Exploring Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Print and Digital Reading Materials
pp. 1 - 15
Publish Date: September 30, 2025 | Single/Total View: 11/11 | Single/Total Download: 11/12
Abstract
With the advancement of technology, the shift from printed to digital reading materials has sparked concerns regarding their effects on students' engagement and comprehension. While previous studies have looked into these issues, there's still a gap in understanding how students personally experience both formats, particularly in literature courses. This study investigates third-year Literature students' perspectives on printed and digital reading materials in literature courses. A qualitative approach was employed through in-depth interviews to explore their preferences and experiences of both reading formats. The findings revealed that while digital materials offer convenience, printed materials support deeper engagement and comprehension. These findings explain the benefits of printed materials while identifying areas of improvement in digital materials. This study, therefore, recommends instructors to identify suitable reading materials that contribute to student engagement and effective learning. Moreover, future research should focus on specific strategies to enhance student engagement with digital texts.
Keywords: Literature, printed materials, digital materials, benefits, drawbacks.
APA 7th edition
Calatero, J., Mosqueda, C., Yurong, M.J., Montanez, M.C., Camilo, R., & Cutillas, A. (2025). Exploring Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Print and Digital Reading Materials. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 16(3), 1-15.
Harvard
Calatero, J., Mosqueda, C., Yurong, M., Montanez, M., Camilo, R. and Cutillas, A. (2025). Exploring Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Print and Digital Reading Materials. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 16(3), pp. 1-15.
Chicago 16th edition
Calatero, Jessa, Chavee Mosqueda, Monica Jane Yurong, Ma. Cristilina Montanez, Rachel Camilo and Anesito Cutillas (2025). "Exploring Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Print and Digital Reading Materials". International Journal of Educational Researchers 16 (3):1-15.
A.A., I., Ngurah, I., & Marhaeni, R. (2016). Rosenblatt’s transactional theory and its implementation in the teaching of integrated reading. *Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan*. [https://doi.org/10.17977/JIP.V5I4.1052](https://doi.org/10.17977/JIP.V5I4.1052)
Abi Ningsih, A., Weganofa, R., & Mafulah, S. (2023). Exploring the challenges of digital textbooks in reading comprehension. *KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, dan Sastra)*, 7(2), 29–36.
Abusailan, A., Ariadna, V., & Abatayo, A. (2023). Caught in the slow lane: Effects of unstable internet connectivity on accessing academic resources and collaborative learning. *Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan*. [https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0370](https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0370)
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. *Computers in Human Behavior*, 28(6), 1816–1828. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.013](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.013)
Aleksejs, Š., & Jūlija, S. (2023). Word, text, and reading in the digital age. *Vārds un tā pētīšanas aspekti*. [https://doi.org/10.37384/vtpa.2023.27.072](https://doi.org/10.37384/vtpa.2023.27.072)
Alina, C., David, R., & Axon, D. (2023). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: An overview. *JACCP: Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy*. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1817](https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1817)
Amina, P., Bashir, F., Nazir, A., Phayaola, N., & Zimik, S. J. (2024). Pedagogical strategies for developing digital literacy. In *Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book Series*. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-8-3693-2591-9.ch011](https://doi.org/10.4018/978-8-3693-2591-9.ch011)
Anisha, K. (2019). Revisiting Rosenblatt’s transactional approach through Shaun Tan’s *The Red Tree*. *Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics*.
Anita, H., Tun, Z. O., & Andrea, M. (2024). The effect of reading strategy use on online reading comprehension. *Heliyon*. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24281](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24281)
Antona, B., Barrio, A. R., Gasco, A., Pinar, A., Gonzalez-Perez, M., & Puell, M. C. (2018). Symptoms associated with reading from a smartphone in conditions of light and dark. *Applied Ergonomics*, 68, 12–17. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.013](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.013)
Axel, K., Schwabe, H. G., Boomgarden, L., Brandl, G., Stocker, G. L., Brendel-Kepser, I., & Krause-Wolters, M. (2022). Who gets lost? How digital academic reading impacts equal opportunity in higher education. *New Media & Society*. [https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211072306](https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211072306)
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. *Qualitative Research in Psychology*, 3(2), 77–101. [https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa](https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa)
Carolynn, H., Ben, J., Megan, V., Erin, P., Ayda, T.-K., & Suzanne, C. (2024). Children’s reading outcomes in digital and print mediums: A systematic review. *Journal of Research in Reading*. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12461](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12461)
Citra, K., Shirly, R. K., Turner, L., & Surahman, E. (2022). Improving language teaching and learning processes with dual coding theory approaches. *Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan*. [https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i8.15313](https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i8.15313)
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. *The Journal of Positive Psychology*, 12(3), 297–298. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613](https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613)
Daniela, M. P. L., Douglas, A. V., Priscila, C. O., Mariana, R. B., João, P. P. L., Márcia, R. G., & Silvia, G. R. (2021). Estresse visual associado à dificuldade de leitura: Prevalência e intervenção em alunos do ensino fundamental. *Research, Society and Development*. [https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19914](https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19914)
Devi, S., & Mohanraj, B. (2024). Exploring the depths. In *Advances in Information Quality and Management* (pp. 267–292). [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-8-3693-1726-6.ch014](https://doi.org/10.4018/978-8-3693-1726-6.ch014)
Elaine, W., & Meghan, M. (2015). Interview methods (structured, semistructured, unstructured). In *The Wiley Encyclopedia of Management* (pp. 1–5). [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa318](https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa318)
Elham, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviews as the foundation for interdisciplinary research about the built environment, health, and happiness. *ARH: Architecture Research Highlights*, 8. [https://doi.org/10.18485/arh_pt.2024.8.ch80](https://doi.org/10.18485/arh_pt.2024.8.ch80)
Foorman, B. R., & Wanzek, J. (2015). Classroom reading instruction for all students. In *Handbook of Response to Intervention: The Science and Practice of Multi-Tiered Systems of Support* (pp. 235–252). Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-6_14](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-6_14)
Gonca, K. C., Esra, S., & Kerem, T. (2013). E-book versus printed materials: Preferences of university students. *Contemporary Educational Technology*. [https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096](https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096)
H., A. H., Sarah, R., & Elizabeth, F. C. (2022). Student perceptions of reading digital texts for university study. *Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education*. [https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.817](https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi24.817)
Hadi, P., Eeman, A., & Atik, U. (2023). Students’ digital reading habits for digital academic text and their achievement. *Indonesian Journal of English Teaching*, 12(1), 73–82. [https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2023.12.1.73-82](https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2023.12.1.73-82)
