International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1308-9501
International Journal of Educational Researchers
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2012, Vol. 3(1) 17-32

The Investigation Of The Abstracts Of Theses And Dissertations In The Domain Of Measurement And Evaluation

Ezel Tavşancıl, Göksu Gözen Çıtak & Fatih Kezer

pp. 17 - 32   |  Manu. Number: ijers.2012.002

Published online: March 01, 2012  |   Number of Views: 231  |  Number of Download: 864

Save PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the abstracts of theses and dissertations completed in the field of measurement and evaluation in state universities (Abant Izzet Baysal University, Ankara University, Hacettepe University and Mersin University) in Turkey between 2000 and 2009 in terms of categories of form and content considering the standards determined by American Psychological Association-APA. Within the framework of this qualitative research which can be qualified as documentary analysis, 90 Master of Science (M.Sc.) and 21 Doctorate (Ph.D.) theses completed at universities aforementioned are examined. Within the framework of the study, a data collection tool that aims to investigate the abstracts of the researches’ systematically has been devised. Abstracts are studied by this instrument by each researcher independently and in order to attain the inter-participant consistency, the codes with regards to the coding scheme in data collection tool given to the same abstracts are compared. Data is analyzed through descriptive and content analysis. The content of the abstracts is presented and interpreted by either based on frequency counts and percentages of the categories used in deciding whether the specified criteria are matched or giving direct quotations. The findings indicate that information about the aim of research is not presented at one fourth; the aim is a repetition of title at one third of abstracts at Master’s Degree. At one third of the abstracts at Doctoral Degree, findings of the research are not presented; at the four fifth of the abstracts of Master’s Degree, 19 of 21 abstracts at Doctoral Degree, there is not research design; in the half of abstracts at Master’s Degree and three fourth of abstracts at Doctoral Degree, there is not data collection procedure; at one third of abstracts at Master’s Degree and one third of abstracts at Doctoral Degree, there are not data analysis techniques. These findings imply that the abstracts have crucial inadequacies regarding to the features which determine the quality of research.

Keywords: Abstract of thesis and dissertations, Measurement and evaluation, Qualitative research, Content analysis

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Tavsancil, E., Citak, G.G. & Kezer , F. (2012). The Investigation Of The Abstracts Of Theses And Dissertations In The Domain Of Measurement And Evaluation. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 3(1), 17-32.

Harvard
Tavsancil, E., Citak, G. and Kezer , F. (2012). The Investigation Of The Abstracts Of Theses And Dissertations In The Domain Of Measurement And Evaluation. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 3(1), pp. 17-32.

Chicago 16th edition
Tavsancil, Ezel, Goksu Gozen Citak and Fatih Kezer (2012). "The Investigation Of The Abstracts Of Theses And Dissertations In The Domain Of Measurement And Evaluation". International Journal of Educational Researchers 3 (1):17-32.

References
  1. Adams, G. B. ve White, J. D. (1994). Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: An assessment of methods and quality. Public Administration Rewiew, 54(6), 565-576. [Google Scholar]
  2. Amerikan Psikoloji Demeği Yayım Kılavuzu (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5.Baskı). (C. Pamay ve Z. G. Üstün, Çev.). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınlan No: 406. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 2001.) [Google Scholar]
  3. American Psychological Association (1984). Preparing abstracts for journal articles andPyschological Abstracts [Draft]. Washington, DC: Author. [Google Scholar]
  4. Altınkurt, L. (2007). Sanat eğitimi ile ilgili lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi.Milli Eğitim, 173, 105-113. [Google Scholar]
  5. Balcı, A. (1993). Türkiye’de eğitim araştırmalarının durumu: A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi örneği. Eğitim Bilimleri Birinci Ulusal Kongresi, Bildiriler III. Ankara: 24-28 Eylül 1990. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cleary, R. (2000). The public administration doctoral dissertation reexamined: An evaluation of the dissertations of 1998. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 446-455. [Google Scholar]
  7. Coorough, C. ve Jack, N. (1997). The dissertation in education from 1950 to 1990. Educational Research Quarterly, 20(4), 3-14. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dewey, J. (1933) How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Revised ed.), Boston: D. C. Heath. [Google Scholar]
  9. Erkuş, A. (1999). Üç üniversitedeki lisansüstü tez çalışmalarının psikometrik açıdan durumu. IV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri Cilt:4. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No:1076- Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları No:51, Eskişehir. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ertürk, S. (1975). Bilim Eğitiminin Felsefe Temelleri- V. Bilim Kongresi Bilim Adamı Yetiştirme Grubu Tebliğleri. Ankara: TÜBİTAK Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  11. Işıksoluğu, M. (1994). Tezler ve danışmanlık. Eğitim ve Bilim, 18(94), 57-66. [Google Scholar]
  12. Juodaityte, A. ve Kazlauskiene, A. (2008). Research methods applied in doctoral dissertations in education science (1995-2005): Theoretical and empirical analysis. Vocational Education: Research & Reality, 15, 36-45. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaptan, S. (1981). Bilimsel araştırma teknikleri ve istatistik yöntemleri. Ankara: Rehber Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  14. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (20.baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kivirauma, J. (1999). Finnish doctoral theses in education in the 1900s. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 295- 312. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kolaç, E. (2008). İlk okuma yazma alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin değerlendirilmesi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi VII. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Çanakkale: 2-4 Mayıs 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kökdemir, D., Demirutku, K., Çırakoğlu, O. C., Işın, G., Muratoğlu, B. ve Yeniçeri, Z. (2004). Akademik yazım kuralları kitapçığı. Ankara: Başkent Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Eleştirel-Yaratıcı Düşünme ve Davranış Araştırmaları Laboratuarı. [Google Scholar]
  18. McCurdy, H.E. ve Cleary, R.E. (1984). Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration? Public Administration Review, 44(1), 49-55. [Google Scholar]
  19. 31    The International Journal of Educational Researchers (IJERs)  [Google Scholar]
  20. Nelson, J. ve Coorough, C. (1994). Content analysis of the PhD versus EdD dissertation. Journal of ExperimentalEducation, 62(2), 158-168. [Google Scholar]
  21. Oruç, Ş. ve Ulusoy, K. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi alanında yapılan tez çalışmaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 121-132. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ramazan, O., Öztuna, A., ve Dibek, E. (2005). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü İlköğretim Anabilim Dalı yüksek lisans tezlerinde yapılan hatalar. II. Lisansüstü Eğitim Sempozyumu Bildirileri, Eskişehir: 26-28 Eylül 2005. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramazan, O. ve Balat, U. G., (2007). Çeşitli üniversitelerde okul öncesi dönem ve eğitimi ile ilgili yapılmış olan yüksek lisans tezlerinin konu alanı açısından incelenmesi. II. Lisansüstü Eğitim Sempozyumu Bildirileri, Eskişehir: 26-28 Eylül 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. Taymaz, H. (1985). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesinde yapılan doktora tezleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 10(56), 27-31. [Google Scholar]
  25. Türkdoğan, O. (1989). Bilimsel değerlendirme ve araştırma metodolojisi. İstanbul: MEB Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yıldırım, C. (1973). 100 soruda bilim felsefesi. İstanbul: Gerçek Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yıldız, A. (2004). Türkiye’deki yetişkin eğitimi araştırmalarına toplu bakış. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 78-97. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 3 Issue 1

March 2012

All Articles

International Journal of Educational Researchers

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.