International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1308-9501

Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2024, Vol. 15(2) 52-68

Exploring Users’ Lived Experiences of School Built Environments: Evidence from Ghanaian Basic Education Context

Wisdom Agbevanu

pp. 52 - 68   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1041.4   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2402-24-0004.R1

Published online: June 30, 2024  |   Number of Views: 17  |  Number of Download: 69


Abstract

This phenomenological research investigates the lived experiences and interpretations of learners, teachers, and head teachers as users of school-built environments (SBEs) in the context of basic education in Ghana. Ten participants (four learners, four teachers, and two school leaders) were sampled purposively from two basic education schools (one public and one private). To explore the meanings attributed to these spaces, the study used qualitative interviews, photo elicitation, physical observations and thematic analysis to shed light on the often-overlooked aspects of users’ lived experiences. The findings revealed that SBEs elicit both positive and negative emotions and convey messages of support or neglect, influenced by physical, functional, psychosocial, and aesthetic factors. Positive and supportive SBEs provide conducive and safe instructional and non-instructional spaces, whereas negative and neglectful SBEs contribute to inequities in teaching and learning outcomes. This research emphasizes the importance of policymakers and designers taking user perspectives into account to address SBE inequities and promote justice within educational settings.

Keywords: School built environments, users, lived experiences, phenomenology, basic education


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Agbevanu, W. (2024). Exploring Users’ Lived Experiences of School Built Environments: Evidence from Ghanaian Basic Education Context . International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(2), 52-68. doi: 10.29329/ijer.2024.1041.4

Harvard
Agbevanu, W. (2024). Exploring Users’ Lived Experiences of School Built Environments: Evidence from Ghanaian Basic Education Context . International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(2), pp. 52-68.

Chicago 16th edition
Agbevanu, Wisdom (2024). "Exploring Users’ Lived Experiences of School Built Environments: Evidence from Ghanaian Basic Education Context ". International Journal of Educational Researchers 15 (2):52-68. doi:10.29329/ijer.2024.1041.4.

References
  1. Agbevanu, W. K. (2014). Exploring lived experiences of users of school-built environments in the Ghanaian context of basic education [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast]. https://ir.ucc.edu.gh/xmlui/handle/123456789/3829 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agbevanu, W. K. (2015). Understanding school-built environments in the Ghanaian context of basic education: A basic conceptual model. In A. Arigbaby, Y. A. Ankomah, N. Adetoro, M. B. A. Bakah, S. E. Oladipo, & K. Boadu (Eds.), 1st Interdisciplinary Conference of UCC-TASUED (pp. 1219–1236). UCC-TASUED. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agbevanu, W. K., Dare, A. L., & Bosu, R. S. (2016). Cosmetic facility condition as a correlate of academic achievement of students in Greater Accra public senior high schools. Journal of Educational Management, 7(2), 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajjawi, R., & Higgs, J. (2007). Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report, 12(4), 612–638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Alsaigh, R., & Coyne, I. (2021). Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer’s philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Baird, G. (2015). Users’ perceptions of sustainable buildings – Key findings of recent studies. Renewable Energy, 73, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Barraza, G. (2021). The role of aesthetics in classroom design: Implications for engagement and equity [Master’s thesis, University of San Francisco]. https://repository.usfca.edu/thes/1385 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartuska, T. J. (2007). The built environment: Definition and scope. In W. R. McClure & T. J. Bartuska (Eds.), The built environment: A collaborative inquiry into design and planning (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bryant, J. P. (2018). A phenomenological study of preschool teachers’ experiences and perspectives on inclusion practices. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1549005. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1549005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Casey, E. S. (2001). J.E. Malpas’s Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography (Cambridge University Press, 1999) Converging and diverging in/on place. Philosophy & Geography, 4(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770123141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Chan, E. T. H., Li, T. E., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2021). People and their walking environments: An exploratory study of meanings, place and times. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(9), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1793437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc. [Google Scholar]
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications Inc. [Google Scholar]
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dare, A. L., & Agbevanu, W. K. (2012). Structural facility condition and academic achievement of students in Greater Accra public senior high schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership (IJEL), 4(4), 263–273. [Google Scholar]
  16. Earthman, G. (2002). School facility conditions and student academic achievement. UCLA's Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439 [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Nemr, K. W., & Cash, C. S. (2022). School building conditions’ influence on student behaviour in a medium-sized division in Virginia. Educational Planning, 29(2), 43–60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1356892.pdf [Google Scholar]
  18. Frechette, J., Bitzas, V., Aubry, M., Kilpatrick, K., & Lavoie-Tremblay, M. (2020). Capturing lived experience: Methodological considerations for interpretive phenomenological inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920907254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (3rd ed.). Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghana Education Service. (2013, n.d.). Ensuring quality basic education in the 21st century: Ghanaian perspective. http://www.ges.gov.gh [Google Scholar]
  21. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth-generation evaluation. Sage. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hagedorn, M. (1994). Hermeneutic photography. Advances in Nursing Science, 17(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199409000-00007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Hays, D. G., & Singh, A. A. (2012). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. The Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Head, G. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. SCM Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Henriksson, C., & Friesen, N. (2012). Introduction. In N. Friesen, C. Henriksson, & T. Saevi (Eds.), Hermeneutic phenomenology in education: Methods and practice (Vol. 4) (pp. 1–14). Sense Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  27. Holt, J. (1974). Involving the users in school planning. The School Review, 82(4), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1086/443163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Kjævrang, U. (2003). Power of aesthetics to improve student learning. DesignShare Database [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, M., & Rubin, V. (2007). The impact of the built environment on community health: The state of current practice and next steps for a growing movement. PolicyLink and California Endowment. [Google Scholar]
  30. Magno, C., & Kirk, J. (2008). Imaging girls: visual methodologies and messages for girls’ education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 38(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920802066667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Manca, S., Cerina, V., Tobia, V., Sacchi, S., & Fornara, F. (2020). The effect of school design on users’ responses: A systematic review (2008–2017). Sustainability, 12(8), 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Maslow, A. H., & Mintz, N. L. (1956). Effects of esthetic surroundings: I. Initial effects of three esthetic conditions upon perceiving “energy” and “well-being” in faces. The Journal of Psychology, 41(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1956.9713000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Ministry of Education. (2018a). Education Strategic Plan 2018-2030. Ministry of Education [Google Scholar]
  35. Ministry of Education. (2018b). National pre-tertiary education curriculum framework for developing subject curricula. https://nacca.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/National-Pre-tertiary-Education-Curriculum-Framework-final.pdf [Google Scholar]
  36. Mohammadi, N. (2007). A hermeneutic phenomenological inquiry into the lived experience of Muslim patients in Australian hospitals. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide of South Australia]. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/47562/8/02whole.pdf [Google Scholar]
  37. Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nivala, J. F. (1997). Saving the spirit of our places: A view on our built environment. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 15, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  39. OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT [Large language model] (Mar 14 version). https://chat.openai.com/chat [Google Scholar]
  40. Pasalar, C. (2001). The meaning and perception of school buildings. EDRA 32-2001: Old World - New Ideas, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  41. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rafiei, S., & Gifford, R. (2023). The meaning of the built environment: A comprehensive model based on users traversing their university campus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment: A non-verbal communication approach (2nd ed.). University of Arizona Press. [Google Scholar]
  44. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion. [Google Scholar]
  45. Relph, E. (1985). Geographical experiences and being-in-the-world: The phenomenological origins of geography. In D. Seamon & R. Mugerauer (Eds.), Dwelling, place, and environment: Towards a phenomenology of person and world (pp. 15–31). Martinu. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sallis, J. F., & Glanz, K. (2006). The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child, 16(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2006.0009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Sarantakos, S. (2013). Social research (4th ed.). Red Globe Press. [Google Scholar]
  48. Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and placelessness, Edward Relph. In P. Hubbard, R. Kitchen, & G. Vallentine (Eds.), Key texts in human geography (pp. 43–51). Sage. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sheets, M. G. (2011). The relationships between the conditions of school facilities and certain educational outcomes. The ACEF Journal, 1(1), 51–65. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth309022/ [Google Scholar]
  50. Skantze, A. (1996). Built environment and meaning: The architecture of a suburb from a user perspective. IAPS 14 Conference Proceedings, 277–282. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minneapolis Press. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ulrich, D., & Duffy, T. (2022, n.d.). The impact of the built school environment on student engagement and learning. https://essentials.edmarket.org/2022/04/the-impact-of-the-built-school-environment-on-student-engagement-and-learning/ [Google Scholar]
  53. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2023, n.d.). Basic education. In Glossary. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/basic-education [Google Scholar]
  54. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. SUNY Press. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801936472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  56. Whitehead, L. (2004). Enhancing the quality of hermeneutic research: decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(5), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02934.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  57. Wingspread Declaration on School Connections. (2004). Journal of School Health, 74(7), 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08279.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  58. Woolner, P., Hall, E., Wall, K., & Dennison, D. (2007). Getting together to improve the school environment: User consultation, participatory design and student voice. Improving Schools, 10(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207077846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]