Original article | Open Access
International Journal of Educational Researchers 2015, Vol. 6(1) 31-35
The Adaptation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS)
pp. 31 - 35
Publish Date: March 01, 2015 | Number of Views: 1126 | Number of Download: 2206
Abstract
The aim of this research is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS; Sosu, 2013). Participants were 212 university students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 11 items loaded on two factors (critical openness and reflective scepticism) and the two-dimensional model was well fit (x²=53.24, df= 40, RMSEA=.040, NFI=.90, NNFI=.96, GFI=.96, AGFI=.93, CFI=.97, IFI=.97, and SRMR=.046). The internal consistency coefficients were .68 for critical openness subscale, .75 for reflective scepticism subscale, and .78 for the overall scale. The corrected item-total correlations of CTDS ranged from .25 to .57. Overall findings demonstrated that this scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring individuals’ disposition to critical thinking.
Keywords: Critical thinking, validity, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis
APA 7th edition
AKIN, A., HAMEDOGLU, M.A., ARSLAN, S., AKIN, U., CELIK, E., KAYA, C., & ARSLAN, N. (2015). The Adaptation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS). International Journal of Educational Researchers, 6(1), 31-35.
Harvard
AKIN, A., HAMEDOGLU, M., ARSLAN, S., AKIN, U., CELIK, E., KAYA, C. and ARSLAN, N. (2015). The Adaptation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS). International Journal of Educational Researchers, 6(1), pp. 31-35.
Chicago 16th edition
AKIN, Ahmet, Mehmet Ali HAMEDOGLU, Serhat ARSLAN, Umran AKIN, Eyup CELIK, Cinar KAYA and Nihan ARSLAN (2015). "The Adaptation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS)". International Journal of Educational Researchers 6 (1):31-35.
- Arslan, S. (2012).The influence of environment education on critical thinking and environmental attitude. Procedia-Social andBehavioral Sciences, 55, 902-909. [Google Scholar]
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. PsychologicalBulletin, 88, 588-606. [Google Scholar]
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi yayınları. [Google Scholar]
- Chaffee, J. (1992). Critical thinking skills: The cornerstone of developmental education. Journal of Developmental Educational, 15, 2-39. [Google Scholar]
- Chaffee, J. (1994). Thinking critically. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
- Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (1992). California critical thinking disposition inventory. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449-455. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. StructuralEquationModeling, 6, 1-55. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- McPeck, J. E (1983). Critical thinking and education. Teachers College Record, 85(1), 154-157. [Google Scholar]
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H., (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. [Google Scholar]
- Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107-119. [Google Scholar]
- Walsh, C. M., Seldomridge, L. A., & Badros, K. K. (2007). California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory: Further factor analytic examination. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 141-151 [Google Scholar]
