Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Educational Researchers 2024, Vol. 15(4) 1-19

Opportunities and Challenges of U.S.-Based Professional Development for English Language Teachers in Azerbaijan

Alison Turner & Becky Cibulskis

pp. 1 - 19   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.1

Publish Date: December 30, 2024  |   Single/Total View: 5/2   |   Single/Total Download: 9/2


Abstract

The purpose of this study is to highlight the experiences of teachers during the third iteration of a U.S.-based professional development (PD) program (Kennedy, 2016) for English language teachers (ELTs) in Azerbaijan and explore necessary factors when designing PD for another country or cultural/linguistic context. Designed with the conceptual framework of situated learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991), the PD program centered learning in the context of real lived experieccnces and focused on developing leaders in local communities of practice. We utilize the intrinsic case study methodology (Stake, 1995; Yin, 2003) to explore the experiences of five focal Azerbaijani ELTs during the PD program. We found that participants of the PD course are dedicated practitioners who seek opportunities to grow in their profession; the PD course strengthened their communities of practice, growing confidence among teachers in speaking English; and it promoted limited pedagogical learning and applications in the classroom. However, teachers faced environmental and policy challenges that largely hindered changes to their teaching practices. This study points to implications for future PD programs designed for cross-cultural contexts by building on Desimone’s (2009) framework for effective PD by adding core features and essential contextual factors that must be considered.

Keywords: English language teachers, professional learning and development, Azerbaijan, communicative language teaching


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Turner, A., & Cibulskis, B. (2024). Opportunities and Challenges of U.S.-Based Professional Development for English Language Teachers in Azerbaijan. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.1

Harvard
Turner, A. and Cibulskis, B. (2024). Opportunities and Challenges of U.S.-Based Professional Development for English Language Teachers in Azerbaijan. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(4), pp. 1-19.

Chicago 16th edition
Turner, Alison and Becky Cibulskis (2024). "Opportunities and Challenges of U.S.-Based Professional Development for English Language Teachers in Azerbaijan". International Journal of Educational Researchers 15 (4):1-19. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.1

References
  1. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1995). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Subject learning in the primary curriculum: Issues in English, science, and mathematics (pp. 301–318). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  3. Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-brief [Google Scholar]
  5. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Diaz-Maggioli, G. H. (2003). Professional development for language teachers. ERIC Digest, 3(3), 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duff, P. A. (2014). Communicative language teaching. Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 15–30). National Geographic Learning. [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldschmidt, P., & Phelps, G. (2010). Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much and for how long? Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.002  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Gregson, J. A., & Sturko, P. A. (2007). Teachers as adult learners: Re-conceptualizing professional development. MPAEA Journal of Adult Education, 36(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Guliyev, F. (2016). The quality of education in Azerbaijan: Problems and prospects. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 90, 6–10. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-88306-6 [Google Scholar]
  11. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Hatcher, T. (2008). Towards culturally appropriate adult education methodologies for Bible translators: Comparing Central Asian and Western educational practices. GIALens, 2, 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huseynova, F. (2019). Challenges and new perspectives of teacher training in Azerbaijan: Assessment of pedagogical activities of English language teachers. Azerbaijan Journal of Educational Studies, 688(3), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.29228/edu.28  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Kennedy, A. (2024). The fragility, complexity and interdependence of the global ecosystem of teacher professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2368341  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Kirkpatrick, A. (2020). Englishes in the expanding circle: Focus on Asia. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 24(3), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-3-551-568  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Kissau, S. P., & King, E. T. (2015). Peer mentoring second language teachers: A mutually beneficial experience? Foreign Language Annals, 48, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12121  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, I. (2011). Teachers as presenters at continuing professional development seminars in the English as a foreign language context: “I find it more convincing.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n2.3  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. Manfra, M. M. (2021). Action research for classrooms, schools, and communities. Sage. [Google Scholar]
  21. McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  23. Murray, D. E., & Christison, M. (2019). What English language teachers need to know. Volume I: Understanding learning (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351139847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. O’Brien, B. C., & Battista, A. (2020). Situated learning theory in health professions education research: A scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25, 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Popova, A., et al. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Qasserras, L. (2023). Systematic review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in language education: A balanced perspective. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(6), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.763  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage. [Google Scholar]
  29. UNESCO. (2021). Closing the gap: Ensuring there are enough qualified and supported teachers in sub-Saharan Africa. Teacher Task Force. https://teachertaskforce.org/knowledge-hub/closing-gap-ensuring-there-are-enough-qualified-and-supported-teachers-sub-saharan [Google Scholar]
  30. UNESCO. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-report-teachers-addressing-teacher-shortages-and-transforming-profession [Google Scholar]
  31. Wei, R. C., et al. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council Technical Report. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-learning-learning-profession-status-report-teacher-development-us-and-abroad.pdf [Google Scholar]
  32. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zeggelaar, A., Vermeulen, M., & Jochems, W. (2020). Evaluating effective professional development. Professional Development in Education, 48(5), 806–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]