Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Educational Researchers 2024, Vol. 15(4) 43-68

The Effect of Digital Material Applications on Preservice Teachers'Self-Efficacy towards Educational Technology Standards

Sevilay Aydemir & Özden Demirkan

pp. 43 - 68   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.3

Publish Date: December 30, 2024  |   Single/Total View: 15/23   |   Single/Total Download: 29/24


Abstract

This study aims to explore the transformation processes of pre-service teachers in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes gained through digital material applications and to evaluate their effects on self-efficacy towards educational technology standards. A one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used for the quantitative part, and a phenomenology design was applied for the qualitative part. The study involved 74 first-year pre-service teachers from the English Language Teaching program at a state university during the spring semester of 2023-2024 who were taking the Instructional Technology Course. Data were collected using the Self-Efficacy Scale for Educational Technology Standards (ETSSE) and a Written Opinion Form on Digital Material Applications. In the analysis of the data, a t-test was used for quantitative data and content analysis was used for qualitative data. The findings show that digital material applications significantly enhance pre-service teachers' self-efficacy towards educational technology standards. Participants reported improvements in knowledge, skills, and attitudes, particularly in strengthening pedagogical and technological skills, creative thinking, and professional self-confidence. These results reveal that digital tools contribute significantly to the professional development of pre-service teachers and support effective technology integration in educational processes. The study highlights the importance of continuous training and support in developing digital competencies for teaching. Encouraging the effective use of digital tools can further enhance teaching practices, enrich learning experiences, and build pre-service teachers' confidence in integrating technology into their professional roles.

Keywords: Digital Material Applications, Self-efficacy towards Educational Technology Standards, Technology Integration.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Aydemir, S., & Demirkan, O. (2024). The Effect of Digital Material Applications on Preservice Teachers'Self-Efficacy towards Educational Technology Standards. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(4), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.3

Harvard
Aydemir, S. and Demirkan, O. (2024). The Effect of Digital Material Applications on Preservice Teachers'Self-Efficacy towards Educational Technology Standards. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 15(4), pp. 43-68.

Chicago 16th edition
Aydemir, Sevilay and Ozden Demirkan (2024). "The Effect of Digital Material Applications on Preservice Teachers'Self-Efficacy towards Educational Technology Standards". International Journal of Educational Researchers 15 (4):43-68. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijer.2024.1085.3

References
  1. Akgün, F. (2020). Examining the self-efficacy of pre-service teachers receiving pedagogical formation education towards utilising instructional materials and their attitudes towards instructional technologies. Trakya Education Journal, 10(2), 412-428. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksoğan, M., & Bulut Özek, M. (2020). The relationship between prospective teachers' technology competences and their perspective on technology. Gümüşhane University Institute of Social Sciences Electronic Journal, 11(2), 301-311. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aydoğmuş, M., & Karadağ, Y. (2020). Information and communication technologies (ICT) competences of prospective teachers: The case of Ondokuz Mayıs University. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(3), 686-705. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.715457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Berg, S. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies in higher education teaching: A practical introduction. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 8, 20-27. [Google Scholar]
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2024). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation (31st ed.). PegemA. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cengiz, C. (2014). The development of TPACK, technology integrated self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations of pre-service physical education teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.932332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of the research on the TPACK framework: Technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 31-51. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  9. Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802107179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative research methods (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Eds.). Siyasal Kitabevi. (Original work published 2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2019). A training activity for the development of digital competences of prospective teachers: Opinions of pre-service teachers in Böte and other branches. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 9(2), 539-565. [Google Scholar]
  12. Demircioğlu, E., & Yurt, E. (2024). The importance of digital material design skills for classroom teachers' perceptions of professional competence: A relational study. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 13(2), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1346916 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Emre, İ., Kaya Atıcı, E., & Ayaz, E. (2020). Determining the level of technological pedagogical content knowledge of prospective primary school teachers in the context of achievements related to life domains. Maarif Mektepleri International Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 3(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.47155/mamusbbd.787032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Erdemir, N., Bakırcı, H., & Eyduran, E. (2009). Determination of pre-service teachers' self-confidence in using technology in education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 99-108. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/130 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ersoy, M., Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I., & Ceylan, B. (2016). Investigating preservice teachers' TPACK competencies through the lenses of ICT skills: An experimental study. Education and Science, 41(186), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gürsoy, G., & Orhan Göksün, D. (2019). The experiences of pre-service science teachers in educational content development using web 2.0 tools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. ISTE. (2024). ISTE standards: For educators. International Society for Technology in Education. https://iste.org/standards [Google Scholar]
  19. Karakuş, N., & Er, Z. (2021). Turkish teacher candidates' opinions on the use of WEB 2.0 tools. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 177-197. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.837184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. [Google Scholar]
  21. Köksal, D., & Canlı, S. (2024). Examination of teachers' digital competencies. Journal of Science, Education, Art and Technology (BEST Journal), 8(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  22. McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. Pearson/A and B. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Ozan, C., & Taşgın, A. (2017). Examining pre-service teachers' self-efficacy towards educational technology standards. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 236-253. [Google Scholar]
  25. Polat, E., & Göktaş, Y. (2023). Pedagogical digital skills competence level of public school teachers in Turkey. Humanitas, 11(INCSOS VIII Special Issue), 298-318. [Google Scholar]
  26. Saka, A. Z., & Saka, A. (2005). The development level of pre-service teachers' professional skills in instructional technology and material development course: Sakarya example. Sakarya University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10, 81-177. [Google Scholar]
  27. Starkey, L. (2019). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Şimşek, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2017). Investigation of teachers' educational technology standards self-efficacy. Journal of Pegem Education and Training, 7(1), 23-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tatlı, Z., & Bayramoğlu, A. (2015). Reflecting the teaching practice process with digital stories. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 4(2), 16-28. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tiryaki, E. N., & Karakuş, O. (2019). Examining the reading comprehension skills of prospective Turkish teachers through digital application. Journal of Advanced Education Studies, 1(1), 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Y., & Lu, H. (2021). Validating items of different modalities to assess the educational technology competency of pre-service teachers. Computers and Education, 162, 104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods. Seçkin. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage [Google Scholar]