International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1308-9501

Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2011, Vol. 2(1) 1-16

Learner Receptivity Toward Role Play Sımulation In Teaching H.R.M. To University Students In Hong Kong

Andrew Chan

pp. 1 - 16   |  Manu. Number: ijers.2011.001

Published online: March 01, 2011  |   Number of Views: 221  |  Number of Download: 777


Abstract

As an antidote to direct information impartation and passive note taking, role play simulation have been widely considered and introduced in university level learning and teaching of business interactive skills to young adult undergraduates. Besides apparently complementing other lecturing methods and teaching activities, role play serves a number of purposes including student involvement or their active participation. The purpose of role- play is to provide young adult students an opportunity to immerse into a ‘role’ of a job seeker in a pre-determined context. With prior briefing and information given in advance, students are then free to act as they do in real life. Students participating in role play, or the rest of the class who have observed the re-enactment are assumed to be able to experience transference of formal cues and soft interactive skills. Each role-player acts as part of the social environment of the others and provides a framework in which they can study the interacting behavior of the group, so as to acquire real-life skills/ techniques that would be useful in workplaces. This paper examines role-play simulation as a learning tool for university students in the business disciplines who are targeted to become competent with job interview skills and techniques necessary for them to become a potentially competent human resources professional. This paper reflects upon tertiary education instructors’ insights into the possibilities of getting their students to reach their learning objectives by implementing non-traditional teaching methods such as role-plays.

Keywords: higher education, human resource management, interactive learning, business interpersonal skills, role-play simulation


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Chan, A. (2011). Learner Receptivity Toward Role Play Sımulation In Teaching H.R.M. To University Students In Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 2(1), 1-16.

Harvard
Chan, A. (2011). Learner Receptivity Toward Role Play Sımulation In Teaching H.R.M. To University Students In Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Researchers, 2(1), pp. 1-16.

Chicago 16th edition
Chan, Andrew (2011). "Learner Receptivity Toward Role Play Sımulation In Teaching H.R.M. To University Students In Hong Kong". International Journal of Educational Researchers 2 (1):1-16.

References
  1. Bell, B. S., Kanar. A. M., & Kozlowski. S. W. (2008). ‘Current issues and future directions in simulation- based training in North America’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1416-1434. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegerty-Hazel, E. (1986). Teaching in Laboratories. Studies in Research in Higher Education/Nuffield Foundation for Educational Research, Milton Keynes: Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chesler, M. & Fox, R. (1966). Role-PlayingMethods in the Classroom. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates Inc. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen, K. J., & Rhenman, E. (1961). ‘The role of management games in education and research’. Management Science, 7(2): 131-166. [Google Scholar]
  5. COIC: Careers and Occupational Information Centre (1985). Role Play and Simulation. Sheffield: Manpower Services Commission. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook, R. W., & Swift, C. O. (2006). ‘The pedagogical efficacy of a sales management simulation’. Marketing Education Review, 16: 37-46. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dale, A. G., & Klasson, C. R. (1964). Business Gaming: A Survey of American Collegiate Schools of Business. Austin, TX: University of Texas, Bureau of Business Research. [Google Scholar]
  8. Faria, A. J. (2001). ‘The changing nature of business simulation/ gaming research: A brief history’. Simulation & Gaming, 32: 97-110. [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinstein, A. H. (2001). ‘An assessment of the effectiveness of simulation as an instructional system in foodservice’. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 25(4): 421-443. [Google Scholar]
  10. Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). ‘Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams’. Smart Group Research, 37(5): 459-489. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. & Habeshaw, T. (1986). 53 Interesting Ways to Assess your Students. Plymouth: Plymbridge Distributions Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldstein, L. L. (1991). ‘Training in work organizations’. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), [Google Scholar]
  13. Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2, 507-620. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Harden, R.M., & Cairncross, R.G. (1980). ‘Assessment of practical skills: The objective structural practical examination (OSPE)’. Studies in Higher Education, (5): 187 - 196. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, K. (1980). Simulations: A Handbook for Teachers. Kogan Page: London. [Google Scholar]
  16. Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1): 59-69. [Google Scholar]
  17. Keys, B., & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16(2): 307-336. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1976). ‘Evaluation’. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), Training andDevelopment Handbook: 301¬319. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experimental Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). ‘Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation’. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 78: 311-328. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role-Play. Oxford University Press: Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lane, D. C. (1995). ‘On a resurgence of management simulations and games’. The Journal of Operational Research Society, 46(5): 604-625. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marton, F. (1984). (Ed.) The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mathieu. J. E., & Martineau, J. W. (1997). ‘Individual and situational influences on training motivation’. In J. K. Ford, S. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E, Salas, & M. Teachout (Eds.), Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations: 193- 221. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  25. Merrill, M. D. (1975). ‘Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions’. AV Communications Review, 23: 217-226. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). ‘Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics’. Educational Technology Research and Development,. 40: 5-13. [Google Scholar]
  27. Raia, A. P, (1966). ‘A study of the educational value of management games’. Journal of Business, 39(3): 339-352. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reigeluth. C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). ‘The elaboration theory of instruction’. In C. M. Reigeluth, (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories andModels: An Overview of Their Current Status. Vol. 1: 335¬381. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  29. Salas, E., Wildman, J.L. & Piccolo, R.F. (2009). ‘Using simulation-based training to enhance [Google Scholar]
  30. management education’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(4): 559-573. [Google Scholar]
  31. Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Lazzara, E. H., King, H. B., Augenstein, J. S., Robinson, D. W., et al. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  32. ‘ Simulation-based training for patient safety: 10 principles that matter’. Journal of Patient Safety, 8(4): 3-8. [Google Scholar]
  33. Slotte, V., & Herbert, A. (2007). ‘Engaging workers in simulation based e-leaming’. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(3): 165- 180. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tannenbaum, S., & Yukl, G. (1992). ‘Training and development in work organizations’. Annual Review ofPsychology, 43(1): 399-441. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tharenou, P. (2001). ‘The relationship of training motivation to participation in training and [Google Scholar]
  36. development’. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5): 599-621. [Google Scholar]
  37. Van Ments, M. (1999). The Effective Use of Role-Play. London: Kogan Page. [Google Scholar]
  38. Walklin, L. (1982). Instructional Techniques andPractice. Bath: Stanley Thornes Publishing [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolfe, J. (1997). ‘The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work’. Simulation & Gaming, 28(4): 360-376. [Google Scholar]