International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1308-9501

Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2022, Vol. 13(2) 1-16

The Assessment of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Researchers’ Efficiency

Ali Abbas Falah Alzubi

pp. 1 - 16   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2009-01-0002

Published online: June 30, 2022  |   Number of Views: 44  |  Number of Download: 207


The study aimed at investigating the role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools in enhancing the researchers’ efficiency among English as a foreign language (EFL) faculty members. An explanatory mixed methods design was used to collect data from a sample of 43 EFL faculty members through a closed-end online survey and a WhatsApp group. The findings showed that 75% of the participants used ICT tools in the various stages of research. The qualitative data showed that 12 ICT tools including WhatsApp, Internet search engines, Google Forms, Office programs, citation websites and programs, Adobe reader, social networking sites, smart phone cameras, quantitative analysis programs, electronic mail, online word processors and similarity check programs. The findings of this study can be utilized in designing training programs on the employment of ICT in research work in order to empower researchers with more efficiency in using ICT tools for research purposes.

Keywords: Assessment; efficiency; faculty members; higher education; information and communication technology; research

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Alzubi, A.A.F. (2022). The Assessment of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Researchers’ Efficiency . International Journal of Educational Researchers, 13(2), 1-16.

Alzubi, A. (2022). The Assessment of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Researchers’ Efficiency . International Journal of Educational Researchers, 13(2), pp. 1-16.

Chicago 16th edition
Alzubi, Ali Abbas Falah (2022). "The Assessment of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Researchers’ Efficiency ". International Journal of Educational Researchers 13 (2):1-16.

  1. Adegbenro, J. B., Gumbo, M. T., & Olugbara, O. O. (2019). Exploring Technological Knowledge of Office Data Processing Teachers: Using Factor Analytic Methods. In TPACK: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 155-184). IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agyei, D.D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547-564. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015). The effect of social media on researchers’ academic performance through collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 193-203. [Google Scholar]
  4. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. [Google Scholar]
  5. Azra Naseem, Susan Crichton, Leonard Wamakote, Sarah Ojuando & Sally Roach, (2009). Building a Case for the Use of Collaborative Tools for Research, Development and Professional Service. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bahcekapili, E., Bahcekapili, T., Erümit, S. F., Göktas, Y., & Sözbilir, M. (2013). The factors affecting definition of research problems in educational technology researches. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2330-2335. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bugyei, K. A., Obiri-Yeboah, K., & Kavi, R. K. (2017). Assessing the Impact of ICT on Research Activities in Ghana: A Case Study of Selected Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Institutes. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(01), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Cann, A., Dimitriou, K. & Hooley, T. (2011). Social Media: A Guide for Researchers. Research Information Network. [Google Scholar]
  9. Conole, G. & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 113-124. [Google Scholar]
  10. Crook, C., & Harrison, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning at key stages 3 and 4: summary report. Coventry, UK: Becta. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cuff, E. (2014). The effect and importance of technology in the research process. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 75-97. [Google Scholar]
  12. Daniel, D. (2012). Teaching students how to research the past: Historians and librarians in the digital age. The History Teacher, 45(2), 261-282. [Google Scholar]
  13. Essays, UK. (November 2018). Role of ICT in Research Information Technology Essay. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gertrude, K. (2015). Maximizing the effects of collaborative learning through ICT. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1005-1011. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibson, S. E. (1997). Teacher and librarian partnering to integrate computer technology in the classroom. School Libraries Worldwide, 3(1), 47-54. [Google Scholar]
  16. Henderson, M., Snyder, I., & Beale, D. (2013). Social media for collaborative learning: A review of school literature. Australian Educational Computing, 28(2), 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaring, P., & Bäck, A. (2017). How researchers use social media to promote their research and network with industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8), 32-39. [Google Scholar]
  18. Joshi, A., Meza, J., Costa, S., Perin, D. M. P., Trout, K., & Rayamajih, A. (2013). The role of information and communication technology in community outreach, academic and research collaboration and education and support services (IT-CARES). Perspectives in health information management, 10(Fall). [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business horizons, 54(3), 241-251. [Google Scholar]
  21. Muinde, F. N. (2009). Investigation of factors affecting the adoption of information and communication technologies for communication of research output in research institutions in Kenya (PhD thesis), Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakhaei, A., BaniHashemi, S. A., & Ghafouri, M. (2016). ICT feasibilities for doing a better research. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), 16(10), 93-97. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services & Use, 31(1-2), 61-83. [Google Scholar]
  24. Procter, R. N., Williams, R., Stewart, J., Poschen, M., Snee, H., Voss, A., & Asgari-Targhi, M. (2010b). If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0. London, UK: Research Network Information. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodrigo, R. S. (2013). Can you digg it?: Using web applications in teaching the research process. Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, Issue 4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sarkar, S. (2012). The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education for the 21st century. Science, 1(1), 30-41. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tinio, VL. (2003). ICT in education, In Proceedings of UNDP for the benefit of participants to the World Summit on the Information Society, UNDP’s regional project, the Asia-Pacific Development Information Program (APDIP), in association with the secretariat of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). [Google Scholar]
  28. Tondeur, J., Krug, D., Bill, M., Smulders, M., & Zhu, C. (2015). Integrating ICT in Kenyan secondary schools: an exploratory case study of a professional development programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 565-584. [Google Scholar]